Why Left-Wing Women Hate Women on the Right

Posted By Lisa Richards On November 9, 2010 @ 7:00 pm

Left-wing feminists are furious that conservative women are wildly popular. It’s completely unnerving to them that Sarah Palin, a well-educated athlete with a political resume (but considered illiterate because of her western accent, marriage, children, and home state) is the most popular woman in America, even with leftists who obsessively cover all things Sarah. After all, aren’t women supposed to lock-step like a bunch of politically enslaved vote-only-Democrat drones, support abortion, demand better pay (but insist minimum wage stay intact) and sue bosses who fire female incompetents? This is America for heaven’s sake! Women are not supposed to think for themselves, that’s the job of the Democrat Party!

And then came 2008 and Sarah Palin, followed by Michele Bachmann, Nikki Haley, Christine O’Donnell, Linda McMahon, Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman, Sharron Angle, Angela McGlowen, Star Parker … should I stop? This might be too much for anti-female-unless-she-hates-men-and-unborn-babies leftist women to bare.
Bachmann and Haley won, the other GOP ladies lost, much to the glee of left-wing feminists like The Nation’s Betsy Reed who declared:

This result should not come as a huge surprise, given that the GOP Year of the Woman was always mostly hype, fueled by a potent mixture of Republican propaganda, Democratic hysteria and the mainstream media’s fondness for loopy ladies.

As opposed to Nancy Pelosi who did wonders elevating women’s political status with her spoiled demands for military jet-set vacations and claims of not knowing anything about intelligence reports. And let’s not forget Hillary’s contribution to women’s equality–accepting her serial molesting husband’s philandering actions, something feminists allegedly abhor.

Leftists do nothing to elevate women, yet they demand women vote one way and only one way. When women break that iron grip, saying no thank you, I can think and vote for myself, radical feminists turn against women like a pack of rabid grizzlies.

Case in point is Amanda Marcotte, who described Nikki Haley’s win as “the second most telling example of the ‘mama grizzly curse.’”


Marcotte, who appeared on MSNBC with Rachel Maddow, another anti-female female, who described 2010 as the “the worst election season in a generation,” told Maddow one would assume Republican women would have done well just by riding the coattails of men.

Conservative Republican women cannot possibly succeed politically without chasing the male bus leaving women choking in the dust of foolish traditionalism.

Marcotte furthered her splendid analysis claiming the Mama Grizzly image:

hurt [GOP Ladies] in a way, because it was about creating an idea where you could base the anti-feminists [conservative women] and your views and your policies and your demeanor [of looking and acting too traditionally female], but somehow feminists can still have ambition, and I think that kind of contradiction didn’t sit well with certain segments of the public, and I think it hurt them in the polls.

Sorry darlings. Those GOP women you’re trashing did fabulously well in the polls, succeeding until Election Day, as opposed to many male candidates who never saw the light of that day. Feminazis should celebrate that feat rather than making merry over female losses. Instead, radicals view it as a great win for hatred of traditional free-thinkers who don’t follow what Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem dictated women should be.

Reed, Marcotte, and Maddow are typical of the anti-women movement—jealous of women who gain power without abandoning womanhood. They describe conservative females as anti-woman, but the opposite is true. Traditional women champion all women no matter party, because women rising to political power are a step up for all women.

Marcotte said GOP female values and image did not play well with American voters. Maddow said 2010’s loss is similar to McCain’s after putting Palin on his ticket; it caused him to lose voters. Maddow is actually asserting Palin’s VP nomination destroyed McCain, because Palin is too conservative, too traditional, and that is a turn-off to Americans.

Marcotte wrote:

Watching the returns, I was surprised to see Haley behind for a long time, and then barely squeak across the finish at 51% in South Carolina. I felt like a man who ran her campaign would have done at least 10 points better. Finding out that 13% of Nevada voters thought Sharron Angle wasn’t conservative enough? Well, I suspect a certain percentage of conservatives will always be suspicious of female candidates, no matter how right wing.

In other words, GOP women lost because they are so stupid men wouldn’t cast votes for them, let alone women.


How do feminazis explain Hillary’s 2008 primary loss? Left-wing feminists snubbed Hillary, discounting her completely, electing a man. The first time in U.S. history America had a female presidential candidate and feminazis hurled Hillary under the bus. Two years later, radicals are thrilled to see women politically defeated.

And radical feminists wonder why a woman has not been elected to the presidency. It’s because they harbor utter disdain for traditional-thinking women. It’s wonderful Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi are married with children — they support abortion, thus, they are real women, as opposed to moronic lock-steppers who consider love, marriage, and children fulfilling.

Radical feminists demand women can do, have, and accomplish all, and finally, after 200 years, female politicians, doing just that, are considered “unreasonable” according to Marcotte, who told Maddow she hopes “women are not that stupid that they would elect a woman like Palin,” because “that’s insulting” and “women want reproductive rights”—the gentler abortion phrase. But they also want a candidate who fights “for the economy” and stands “against war.”

In that case, feminazis, your female president would be Ron Paul.

Betsy Reed said of GOP ladies:

[D]on’t count the Mama Grizzlies out. Thanks to them, there is a distinct and fascinating gender component to the rancorous divide that has emerged within the Republican Party as a result of the Tea Party insurrection. Ill treated by a GOP establishment…almost exclusively male, women like Palin, O’Donnell and Michele Bachmann are already finding gratification in their ability to remain irksome to Karl Rove…O’Donnell lashed out at the party honchos who spurned her, suggesting that, with Rove and NRSC chair John Cornyn’s support, she could have ‘closed the gap’ and that her loss was a ‘symptom of Republican cannibalism.’ Bachmann—who founded the House Tea Party Caucus—has indicated her interest in a leadership post, which will no doubt discomfit her colleagues because of her embarrassing tendency to take their philosophies to their logical extreme (suggesting, for example, that we could solve unemployment by abolishing the minimum wage). Palin… stands center stage in the drama as the party’s 2012 positioning commences—and she is not afraid to play the gender card…‘Some within the establishment don’t like the fact that I won’t back down to a good-old-boys club.’

Heaven forbid employers and employees negotiate salaries based on talent. That might encourage higher wages for intelligent, skilled women! Heaven forbid GOP ladies close the gender gap and win the next election. That would destroy everything radical feminists worked hard to extinguish—womanhood.

Good grief American ladies, stop thinking for yourselves, that’s the job of the Democrat Party and radical anti-female feminists!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from NewsReal Blog: http://www.newsrealblog.com

URL to article: http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/11/09/why-left-wing-women-hate-women-on-the-right/