Posted By Lori Ziganto On November 24, 2010 @ 7:30 am
These days, the biased leftist slant of the media is more apparent than it has ever been. They are spinning madly, increasingly frantic with fear of those super scary Tea Partiers and oh-so-terrifying conservatives. And when you add Sarah Palin and race-based identity politics [1] into the mix, it becomes a perfect storm of unabashed — and unbalanced — leftist water carrying.
The Washington Post’s Richard Cohen is the latest to exhibit just how unglued the Left [3] and the media, being concentric circles on a Venn diagram, natch, have become. Newsbusters points out [4] that in the article titled “Attack on Michelle Obama shows Palin’s ignorance of history [5],” Cohen comes to the inane, and typically leftist, conclusion that Sarah Palin “could not be the president of black America nor of Hispanic America.” Um. Sure, I’m no swanky-pants Washington Post columnist, nor do I even have the vast experience of a community organizer from which to draw, but I’m fairly certain that the presidency isn’t segregated.
Can’t let pesky facts stand in the way of a hit piece, though, can he? How does Cohen form his brilliant – and sure-fire entre into a good cocktail party this weekend – hypothesis?
Because Sarah Palin dares to mention the following in her new book [6]:
In her new book, she reportedly takes Michelle Obama to task for her supposedly infamous remark from the 2008 campaign: “For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.” [...]Huh. Again, I’m no expert, but it seems to me that Michelle Obama actually did say that [7].
So, by “taking her to task,” he of course means smearing with, you know, the truth. Oh, that wing-nutty Palin! Telling the truth and all. That’s so reactionary and old school! I suppose they don’t like that whole “Truth to Power” thing turned around on them. The book snippet to which he refers is as follows:
Certainly his wife expressed this view when she said during the 2008 campaign that she had never felt proud of her country until her husband started winning elections. In retrospect, I guess this shouldn’t surprise us, since both of them spent almost two decades in the pews of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s church listening to his rants against America and white people.Cohen isn’t alone in his delusions. The Huffington Post called that passage “racially charged [8].” Why? Because the Left, in their stompy foot temper tantrums, are letting their true colors show. And they are racist ones. It is the Left who only sees color. It is the Left who paints people into identity politics laden boxes only, in order to further their own end. They use people as a means to that end, with no regard to the harm it causes. This is evidenced further by Cohen, who after predictably bringing up slavery, went on to grossly say this [4]:
Sarah Palin teases that she might run for president. But she is unqualified – not just in the (let me count the) usual ways, but because she does not know the country. She could not be the president of black America nor of Hispanic America. She knows more about grizzlies than she does about African Americans – and she clearly has more interest in the former than the latter. Did she once just pick up the phone and ask Michelle Obama what she meant by her remark? Did she ask about her background? What it was like at Princeton? What it was like for her parents or her grandparents? I can offer a hint. If they were driving to Washington, they slowed down and stopped where the sign said “colored” – and the irritated Palins of the time angrily hit the horn and went on their way.Not only vile, but wrong. It is the Left who are still enslaving. They require people, particularly women and minorities, to walk and think in lockstep. It is people like Barbara Boxer, not Sarah Palin, who have no interest in African-Americans and what they think. Barbara Boxer doesn’t even realize that people have minds of their own. In a new version of the odious “y’all look alike’ bigotry, Barbara Boxer holds the disgusting belief that all people in the Left’s little boxed up identity groups must all think the same way [9]. All “you people” think the same, you see. It was Harry Reid, not Sarah Palin, who condescending sneered “I don’t know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican [10].”
The Smarter Than Us ™ Left, including their media lackeys, doesn’t believe in Post-Racial anything. In fact, quite the opposite: Their bread and butter is identity politics. In order to maintain power, they absolutely must put everyone in victim boxes and attempt to pit people against one and another. This worked to great effect in the past, with the media’s complicity. It’s far past time we put an end to it. While I expect the vitriol and animus spewed at Sarah Palin to get even worse, unbelievable as that is, the media’s cover has been blown. The media has been, and will continue to be, exposed due in part to the hateful and delusional rantings of the likes of Richard Cohen.
To be fair, Richard Cohen, you are right in one regard. Sarah Palin couldn’t be president of black America. Because that isn’t, you know, a country. Contrary to your desires, and to John Edwards’ ridiculous Two Americas spiel, we are one nation. You, sir, are the one who is ignorant of history. First grade history, no less.
We don’t have segregated presidencies. Nor should we. The very idea is racist in and of itself. What we do have are presidents of the United States of America.
—
cross-posted from NewsReal [11]
URL to article: http://bigjournalism.com/lziganto/2010/11/24/wapos-richard-cohen-shows-his-bias-and-his-true-racist-colors-in-palin-hit-piece/
URLs in this post:
[1] identity politics: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/Al%20Sharpton%20Dust%20Off%20Your%20Resume.html
[2] Image: http://bigjournalism.com/files/2010/11/Picture-85.png
[3] Left: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=144&type=issue
[4] Newsbusters points out: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/11/23/wapos-richard-cohen-palin-couldnt-be-president-black-america-or-hispa
[5] Attack on Michelle Obama shows Palin’s ignorance of history: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/22/AR2010112204388.html
[6] her new book: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0062010964?ie=UTF8&tag=fronmaga-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0062010964
[7] Michelle Obama actually did say that: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/2008/02/18/will-media-ignore-michelle-obama-remark
[8] called that passage “racially charged: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-dunn/sarah-palin-michelle-obama-book-america-by-heart_b_785784.html
[9] identity groups must all think the same way: http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/22/10-bigoted-remarks-made-by-the-tolerant-left-in-obamas-post-racial-america/4/
[10] “I don’t know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican: http://michellemalkin.com/2010/08/11/harry-reid-pulls-out-race-card-again-whacks-himself-in-the-head/
[11] from NewsReal: http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/11/23/wapos-richard-cohen-shows-his-bias-and-his-true-racist-colors-in-palin-hit-piece/
No comments:
Post a Comment